The DV Act provides comprehensive legal protection for women facing domestic violence. Some of the important sections include:
Domestic Violence Act and IPC
- Definition of Domestic Violence (Section 3): This section defines domestic violence broadly, encompassing physical, emotional, economic, and sexual abuse. Importantly, it recognizes violence against children and live-in partners.
- The Supreme Court, in the case of Lalita Toppo vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr[1], established that maintenance claims can be sought under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Domestic Violence Act), even if the claimant does not hold the legal status of a married wife eligible for maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The Court elucidated that Section 3(a) of the Domestic Violence Act encompasses “economic abuse” within the definition of “domestic violence.” Therefore, individuals falling within the purview of this Act, such as an estranged wife or a live-in partner, have the right to claim maintenance. The Court emphasized that the relief available under the Domestic Violence Act extends beyond what is provided under Section 125 of the CrPC. For instance, it includes entitlement to a shared household, indicating a broader scope of protection and relief for victims of domestic violence or economic abuse compared to remedies available solely under Section 125 of the CrPC.
- Rights of Aggrieved Persons (Chapter III): This chapter outlines the rights of victims, including:
- Right to residence in shared household: The court can grant the aggrieved person the right to reside in the shared household, even if it’s owned by the respondent. (Section 19)
- The proviso to Section 19 of the Domestic Violence Act explicitly states that no order under Section 19(1)(b) of the Act can be issued against a woman. In the case of S Meenavathi Vs Senthamarai Selvi[2], it was established that female members of the family cannot be evicted from the shared household under the guise of obtaining an order under Section 19(1)(b) of the Domestic Violence Act.
- Maintenance and compensation: The court can order the respondent to provide financial support and compensation for damages suffered. (Sections 18 & 22)
- Section 20
- In a case of Vijayanand Dattaram Naik v. Vishranti Vijayanand Naik[3] by Justice C.V. Bhadang of the Bombay High Court’s Goa bench, an order for maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) was set aside due to the absence of any proven act of domestic violence committed by the husband. The High Court allowed the husband’s plea and nullified the trial court’s decision, which had partially granted the wife’s application filed under Section 20 of the DV Act. Consequently, the wife was provided with the option to pursue alternative legal remedies available to her. However, for a temporary duration of six months, the husband was directed to pay a monthly sum of Rs 5,000 as maintenance to the spouse. This ruling was based on the absence of substantiated evidence of domestic violence perpetrated by the husband, leading to the cancellation of the maintenance order under the DV Act while allowing the wife to explore other legal avenues for relief.
- Custody of children: The court can grant custody of children to the aggrieved person or make other arrangements for their welfare. (Section 21)
- Protection orders: The court can issue orders prohibiting the respondent from entering the shared household, harassing or intimidating the aggrieved person, etc. (Section 18)
- Duties of Police and Service Providers (Chapter IV): This chapter outlines the responsibilities of police officers, magistrates, and service providers such as NGOs and medical facilities. They are required to:
- Assist aggrieved persons in filing complaints and accessing support.
- Investigate complaints promptly and sensitively.
- Provide temporary shelter and other necessary services. (Sections 6 & 7)
- Protection Officers (Chapter V): This chapter provides for the appointment of Protection Officers to assist aggrieved persons. They are responsible for:
- Filing domestic incident reports.
- Providing legal aid and counseling.
- Coordinating with police and service providers. (Section 8)
- Offences under the DV Act (Chapter VII): The Act also criminalizes certain acts of domestic violence, such as assault, stalking, and cruelty. (Section 31)
- Several IPC provisions are often invoked in conjunction with the DV Act. These include:
- Section 323 (Assault): This section covers physical assault, which can be a form of domestic violence.
- Section 324 (Voluntarily causing hurt): This section covers acts of physical harm that fall short of grievous hurt.
- Section 354 (Outrage of modesty): This section covers sexual harassment and assault.
- Section 498A (Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty): This section specifically deals with cruelty against married women, although it can be applied in wider circumstances under the DV Act.
- Inder Raj Malik And Ors. vs Sunita Malik[4]
- In the case involving Sunita Malik and Inder Raj Malik, Sunita alleged severe mistreatment, physical abuse, and coercion by her husband and in-laws for monetary gain, leading to significant mental and physical distress. The Delhi High Court addressed two key issues: whether Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, violated the constitutional Double Jeopardy provision, and whether Section 498A of the IPC was ultra vires. The court ruled that individuals could be convicted under both Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 498A of the IPC without infringing upon the Double Jeopardy clause. This decision rested on the distinction between these sections – while Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act penalizes dowry demands, Section 498A of the IPC addresses cruelty against newly married women. As they target different offenses, prosecuting someone under both sections concurrently was deemed legally permissible, affirming the distinct nature of the offenses outlined in these provisions without conflicting with the Double Jeopardy clause of the Indian Constitution.
- Section 504 (Insult intended to provoke breach of the peace): This section covers verbal abuse and threats.
- Section 506 (Punishment for criminal intimidation): This section covers threats to cause harm or injury.
- Several IPC provisions are often invoked in conjunction with the DV Act. These include:
Prem Singh vs State of Haryana[5]
In the case involving the suspicious death of Sumitra, who died within seven years of her marriage to Prem Singh, the Supreme Court dealt with allegations of continuous dowry demands during her marriage, which seemingly ceased after the birth of her son and her parents’ gift of a buffalo to her in-laws. However, Sumitra was found dead due to burn injuries, contradicting the assumption that the dowry demands had ceased. During the appeal, the Court noted that the mother-in-law, who was one of the accused, lived separately, lacked evidence indicating her instigation of the other accused, and had no expected benefit from the dowry demands. Consequently, she was acquitted. However, the Court found the remaining accused guilty under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as their claim of the victim’s suicide by consuming poison was uncorroborated. Moreover, their act of taking Sumitra to the hospital after the incident did not absolve their liability, leading to their justified conviction.
In matters related to domestic violence falling under the DV Act, prosecutors or appellants often strategize to strengthen the case for the client by filing multiple cases under different legal provisions. The filing of applications under the DV Act is often followed by criminal applications under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This aims to provide comprehensive legal recourse and maximize the chances of obtaining justice for the aggrieved party.
An application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is filed to seek specific reliefs and protection for the aggrieved person. This includes seeking protection orders, residence orders, monetary relief, and other reliefs provided under the DV Act. In addition to the DV Act application, criminal applications are filed under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code. These sections may include:
- Section 498A – Cruelty by Husband or Relatives of Husband: When there are allegations of cruelty against the husband or his relatives, this section is often invoked. It deals with instances where the husband or relatives subject the woman to cruelty, both mental and physical, which may amount to harassment or harm.
- Section 306 – Abetment of Suicide: If the case involves incidents where domestic violence led to extreme consequences like suicide, the provision of abetment to suicide under Section 306 might be invoked along with the DV Act.
- Section 354 – Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty: When instances of sexual abuse or assault are part of the domestic violence, Section 354 of the IPC can be applied in conjunction with the DV Act.
- Other relevant sections: Depending on the nature of the case, other sections such as Section 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), Section 406 (criminal breach of trust), or Section 506 (criminal intimidation) might be invoked to complement the case under the DV Act.
Filing both a DV Act application and criminal applications under the IPC aims to create a comprehensive legal approach. The DV Act application primarily focuses on obtaining specific reliefs provided under the Act, while the IPC criminal applications aim to ensure that criminal liabilities, punishments, and legal consequences are pursued against the accused. These multiple filings allow prosecutors to build a stronger case by presenting various aspects of the abuse or violence faced by the aggrieved person. It helps in establishing a broader narrative and providing multiple legal avenues to seek justice.
References:
- https://indiankanoon.org/doc/6354756/
- S Meenavathi Vs Senthamarai Selvi CRL.O.P.(MD)No.12092 of 2008 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1&1 of 2008
- https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5d9199b7714d587fe94e9447
- Inder Raj Malik and Ors. vs Sunita Malik 1986 CriLJ 1510, 1986 (2) Crimes 435, 1986 RLR 220
- https://indiankanoon.org/doc/124429239/
Written by
Astha Kothari
University of Calcutta, Department of Law (Kolkata) (2021-2026)